Colombia vs South Africa: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Colombia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 38,372 t against 37,179 t in Colombia, a difference of 1,193 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 12th of 181 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39,686 t | 1,821 t | 37,865 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 44,643 t | 2,096 t | 42,548 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 41,470 t | 19,321 t | 22,149 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Colombia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 38,372 t against 37,179 t in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Colombia and South Africa?
- 1,193 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Colombia ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 12th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf