Comoros vs Cook Islands: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Comoros
0.03 t
in 2019
Cook Islands
0 t
in 2023
Comoros rank
189th
Cook Islands rank
192nd
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Comoros
- Cook Islands
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.03 t against 0 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.03 t.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 189th and Cook Islands ranks 192nd of 194 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Cook Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.055 t | 2.02 t | 1.97 t | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 2.15 t | 10.98 t | 8.83 t | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Comoros or Cook Islands?
- Comoros, at 0.03 t against 0 t in Cook Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Comoros and Cook Islands?
- 0.03 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Cook Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Cook Islands rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Comoros ranks 189th and Cook Islands ranks 192nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf