Congo vs Dominica: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 25.25 t against 20 t in Congo, a difference of 5.25 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 127th and Dominica ranks 124th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Dominica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.13 t | 0.605 t | 40.52 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.63 t | 0.75 t | 0.12 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 13.75 t | 12.63 t | 1.12 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Congo or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 25.25 t against 20 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Congo and Dominica?
- 5.25 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominica?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Dominica rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 127th and Dominica ranks 124th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf