Congo vs Estonia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Estonia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 20 t against 17.53 t in Estonia, a difference of 2.47 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 136th and Estonia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.1 t | 13.2 t | 63.9 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 12.87 t | 27.51 t | 14.65 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 15.83 t | 129.22 t | 113.39 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Congo or Estonia?
- Congo, at 20 t against 17.53 t in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Congo and Estonia?
- 2.47 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 136th and Estonia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf