Cyprus vs Mauritius: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Cyprus
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 50.73 t against 48.18 t in Cyprus, a difference of 2.55 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mauritius ahead.
Cyprus ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 116th of 194 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.44 t | 490.67 t | 449.23 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 33.39 t | 532.54 t | 499.15 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 42.12 t | 43.3 t | 1.18 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Cyprus or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 50.73 t against 48.18 t in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Cyprus and Mauritius?
- 2.55 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mauritius?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Mauritius rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Cyprus ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 116th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf