Cyprus vs Namibia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Cyprus
48.18 t
in 2024
Namibia
48.38 t
in 2024
Cyprus rank
119th
Namibia rank
118th
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Cyprus
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 48.38 t against 48.18 t in Cyprus, a difference of 0.2 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.
Cyprus ranks 119th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.38 t | 244.11 t | 207.73 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 33.39 t | 780.06 t | 746.67 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 37.59 t | 62.53 t | 24.93 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Cyprus or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 48.38 t against 48.18 t in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Cyprus and Namibia?
- 0.2 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Namibia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Namibia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Cyprus ranks 119th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf