Czechia vs Hungary: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Czechia
4,540 t
in 2024
Hungary
4,431 t
in 2024
Czechia rank
44th
Hungary rank
45th
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Czechia
- Hungary
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 4,540 t against 4,431 t in Hungary, a difference of 109 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hungary ahead.
Czechia ranks 44th and Hungary ranks 45th of 194 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 703.55 t | 1,905 t | 1,201 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 683.86 t | 2,744 t | 2,060 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 3,419 t | 6,129 t | 2,710 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Czechia or Hungary?
- Czechia, at 4,540 t against 4,431 t in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Czechia and Hungary?
- 109 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hungary?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Hungary rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Czechia ranks 44th and Hungary ranks 45th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf