Czechia vs Ireland: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Czechia
4,540 t
in 2024
Ireland
4,633 t
in 2024
Czechia rank
44th
Ireland rank
43rd
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Czechia
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 4,633 t against 4,540 t in Czechia, a difference of 93 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 44th and Ireland ranks 43rd of 194 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 610.42 t | 1,026 t | 415.5 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 683.86 t | 2,275 t | 1,591 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 3,419 t | 14,153 t | 10,734 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Czechia or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 4,633 t against 4,540 t in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Czechia and Ireland?
- 93 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ireland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Ireland rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Czechia ranks 44th and Ireland ranks 43rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf