Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
34 t
in 2017
Democratic Republic of the Congo
20.16 t
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
7th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
9th

Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0200400600800200220122023

How they compare

Democratic People's Republic of Korea currently reports 34 t against 20.16 t in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 13.84 t.

That makes Democratic People's Republic of Korea's figure about 1.7 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th of 12 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 5.75 t 94.92 t 89.17 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 17.6 t 24.31 t 6.71 t Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, at 34 t against 20.16 t in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2017.
What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
13.84 t, with Democratic People's Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-potassic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-quantity-2/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-potassic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-quantity-2/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 4,259 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf