Ecuador vs Mozambique: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 3,033 t against 3,024 t in Ecuador, a difference of 9 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Mozambique ranks 50th of 194 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,308 t | 608.7 t | 15,699 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 8,658 t | 3,936 t | 4,722 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 9,018 t | 4,019 t | 4,999 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ecuador or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 3,033 t against 3,024 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ecuador and Mozambique?
- 9 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mozambique?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Mozambique rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Mozambique ranks 50th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf