Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3,024 t against 2,668 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 356 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14,075 t | 1,850 t | 12,224 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 8,658 t | 7,405 t | 1,254 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 9,018 t | 5,955 t | 3,064 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Ecuador, at 3,024 t against 2,668 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 356 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf