El Salvador vs Gambia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Gambia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 441.54 t against 437.71 t in Gambia, a difference of 3.83 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 75th and Gambia ranks 76th of 181 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15,484 t | 102.89 t | 15,381 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 3,561 t | 383.66 t | 3,177 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 861.43 t | 483.66 t | 377.77 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, El Salvador or Gambia?
- El Salvador, at 441.54 t against 437.71 t in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between El Salvador and Gambia?
- 3.83 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Gambia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Gambia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 75th and Gambia ranks 76th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf