Eswatini vs Ethiopia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 254.25 t against 231.77 t in Eswatini, a difference of 22.48 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 91st and Ethiopia ranks 88th of 194 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,893 t | 607.32 t | 2,285 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 3,262 t | 1,354 t | 1,909 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 9,926 t | 787.84 t | 9,138 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Eswatini or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 254.25 t against 231.77 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Eswatini and Ethiopia?
- 22.48 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ethiopia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Ethiopia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 91st and Ethiopia ranks 88th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf