Eswatini vs Nigeria: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Nigeria
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 231.77 t against 205.3 t in Nigeria, a difference of 26.47 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 91st and Nigeria ranks 93rd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,307 t | 3,903 t | 595.98 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 3,262 t | 1,877 t | 1,385 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 9,926 t | 46.33 t | 9,879 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Eswatini or Nigeria?
- Eswatini, at 231.77 t against 205.3 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Eswatini and Nigeria?
- 26.47 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nigeria?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Nigeria rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 91st and Nigeria ranks 93rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf