Eswatini vs Sudan: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity

Eswatini
231.77 t
in 2023
Sudan
202.24 t
in 2018
Eswatini rank
91st
Sudan rank
94th

Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sudan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200220122023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 231.77 t against 202.24 t in Sudan, a difference of 29.53 t.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Eswatini ranks 91st and Sudan ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Eswatini or Sudan?
Eswatini, at 231.77 t against 202.24 t in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Eswatini and Sudan?
29.53 t, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
Eswatini ranks 91st and Sudan ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 4,259 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf