Ethiopia vs Oman: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 298.39 t against 254.25 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 44.14 t.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Oman ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 88th and Oman ranks 86th of 194 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 607.32 t | 213.63 t | 393.69 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 1,486 t | 370.31 t | 1,116 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 965.7 t | 611.57 t | 354.12 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ethiopia or Oman?
- Oman, at 298.39 t against 254.25 t in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ethiopia and Oman?
- 44.14 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Oman?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Ethiopia and Oman rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 88th and Oman ranks 86th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf