Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 254.25 t against 235.23 t in Uruguay, a difference of 19.02 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 88th and Uruguay ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 829.06 t | 75 t | 754.06 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 1,354 t | 515.26 t | 838.5 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 787.84 t | 1,215 t | 427.29 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ethiopia or Uruguay?
- Ethiopia, at 254.25 t against 235.23 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ethiopia and Uruguay?
- 19.02 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uruguay?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Uruguay rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 88th and Uruguay ranks 90th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf