Jamaica vs Zimbabwe: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Jamaica
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 2,962 t against 2,668 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 294 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,797 t | 1,850 t | 7,947 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 5,086 t | 7,405 t | 2,319 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4,694 t | 5,955 t | 1,260 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Jamaica or Zimbabwe?
- Jamaica, at 2,962 t against 2,668 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Jamaica and Zimbabwe?
- 294 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Zimbabwe rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Jamaica ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf