Liberia vs Suriname: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Liberia
- Suriname
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 150.09 t against 123.5 t in Suriname, a difference of 26.59 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Suriname ahead.
Liberia ranks 98th and Suriname ranks 101st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.21 t | 282.83 t | 280.62 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 280.37 t | 72.28 t | 208.08 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 12.27 t | 116.22 t | 103.95 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Liberia or Suriname?
- Liberia, at 150.09 t against 123.5 t in Suriname as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Liberia and Suriname?
- 26.59 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Liberia and Suriname rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Liberia ranks 98th and Suriname ranks 101st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf