Libya vs Lithuania: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Libya
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 198.04 t against 157.85 t in Libya, a difference of 40.19 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 97th and Lithuania ranks 95th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,420 t | 1,163 t | 256.53 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 330.28 t | 498.12 t | 167.84 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 156.79 t | 897.23 t | 740.45 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Libya or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 198.04 t against 157.85 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Libya and Lithuania?
- 40.19 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Lithuania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Lithuania rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Libya ranks 97th and Lithuania ranks 95th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf