Libya vs Nigeria: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Libya
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 205.3 t against 157.85 t in Libya, a difference of 47.45 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 93rd and Nigeria ranks 90th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,141 t | 5,202 t | 3,061 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 330.28 t | 1,818 t | 1,488 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 156.79 t | 78.13 t | 78.66 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Libya or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 205.3 t against 157.85 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Libya and Nigeria?
- 47.45 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nigeria?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Nigeria rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Libya ranks 93rd and Nigeria ranks 90th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf