Lithuania vs Yemen: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Yemen
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 198.04 t against 150 t in Yemen, a difference of 48.04 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Yemen ahead.
Lithuania ranks 92nd and Yemen ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,271 t | 2,342 t | 1,071 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 512.89 t | 427.72 t | 85.17 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 714.93 t | 413.4 t | 301.53 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Lithuania or Yemen?
- Lithuania, at 198.04 t against 150 t in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Lithuania and Yemen?
- 48.04 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Yemen?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Yemen rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 92nd and Yemen ranks 95th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf