Malta vs Mongolia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Malta
- Mongolia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1.37 t against 1.26 t in Mongolia, a difference of 0.11 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Malta ranks 160th and Mongolia ranks 161st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.33 t | 17.42 t | 6.09 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 6.25 t | 0.09 t | 6.16 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 4.6 t | 0.77 t | 3.83 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Malta or Mongolia?
- Malta, at 1.37 t against 1.26 t in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Malta and Mongolia?
- 0.11 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mongolia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Mongolia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Malta ranks 160th and Mongolia ranks 161st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf