Malta vs Montenegro: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Malta
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 2.85 t against 1.37 t in Malta, a difference of 1.48 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 2.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Malta ranks 160th and Montenegro ranks 157th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.18 t | 88.17 t | 56.98 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 19.88 t | 25.81 t | 5.92 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 4.58 t | 1.46 t | 3.12 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Malta or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 2.85 t against 1.37 t in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Malta and Montenegro?
- 1.48 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Montenegro?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Montenegro rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Malta ranks 160th and Montenegro ranks 157th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf