Mauritius vs Namibia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 50.73 t against 48.38 t in Namibia, a difference of 2.35 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 116th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 490.67 t | 275.81 t | 214.85 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 487.37 t | 712.02 t | 224.65 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 39.87 t | 58.47 t | 18.6 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 50.73 t against 48.38 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 2.35 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Mauritius ranks 116th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf