Nigeria vs Uruguay: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Nigeria
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 235.23 t against 205.3 t in Nigeria, a difference of 29.93 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nigeria ahead.
Nigeria ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,230 t | 50.71 t | 1,179 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 1,877 t | 515.26 t | 1,362 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 78.13 t | 1,019 t | 941.02 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Nigeria or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 235.23 t against 205.3 t in Nigeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Nigeria and Uruguay?
- 29.93 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Uruguay?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Nigeria and Uruguay rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Nigeria ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 90th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf