Oman vs Uruguay: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Oman
- Uruguay
How they compare
Oman currently reports 298.39 t against 235.23 t in Uruguay, a difference of 63.16 t.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 84th and Uruguay ranks 87th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,884 t | 478.06 t | 2,406 t | Oman |
| 2010s | 370.31 t | 563.11 t | 192.8 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 533.28 t | 907.92 t | 374.64 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Oman or Uruguay?
- Oman, at 298.39 t against 235.23 t in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Oman and Uruguay?
- 63.16 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Uruguay rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Oman ranks 84th and Uruguay ranks 87th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf