Panama vs Philippines: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Panama
- Philippines
How they compare
Panama currently reports 2,748 t against 2,489 t in Philippines, a difference of 259 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 53rd and Philippines ranks 55th of 194 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,302 t | 4,092 t | 6,209 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 11,754 t | 4,717 t | 7,037 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 6,550 t | 3,163 t | 3,388 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Panama or Philippines?
- Panama, at 2,748 t against 2,489 t in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Panama and Philippines?
- 259 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Philippines?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Philippines rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Panama ranks 53rd and Philippines ranks 55th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf