Panama vs Zimbabwe: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Panama
2,748 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
2,668 t
in 2023
Panama rank
53rd
Zimbabwe rank
54th
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Panama
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Panama currently reports 2,748 t against 2,668 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 80 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,302 t | 1,850 t | 8,451 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 11,754 t | 7,405 t | 4,349 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 7,501 t | 5,955 t | 1,546 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Panama or Zimbabwe?
- Panama, at 2,748 t against 2,668 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 80 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Panama ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf