Peru vs South Africa: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 38,372 t against 21,437 t in Peru, a difference of 16,935 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.8 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 12th of 180 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,673 t | 1,821 t | 11,852 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 21,865 t | 2,096 t | 19,770 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 22,251 t | 19,321 t | 2,931 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 38,372 t against 21,437 t in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Peru and South Africa?
- 16,935 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Peru ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 12th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf