Romania vs Slovakia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Romania
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 1,295 t against 972.81 t in Romania, a difference of 322.19 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.3 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 67th and Slovakia ranks 66th of 194 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 516.16 t | 450.98 t | 65.18 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 720.73 t | 543.11 t | 177.62 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 2,530 t | 516.52 t | 2,013 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Romania or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 1,295 t against 972.81 t in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Romania and Slovakia?
- 322.19 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Slovakia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Romania and Slovakia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Romania ranks 67th and Slovakia ranks 66th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf