Serbia vs Seychelles: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Serbia
- Seychelles
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 7.52 t against 6.25 t in Seychelles, a difference of 1.27 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 140th and Seychelles ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.03 t | 23.04 t | 59 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 49.29 t | 20.03 t | 29.26 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 266.49 t | 6.25 t | 260.24 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Serbia or Seychelles?
- Serbia, at 7.52 t against 6.25 t in Seychelles as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Serbia and Seychelles?
- 1.27 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Seychelles?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Serbia and Seychelles rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Serbia ranks 140th and Seychelles ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf