Albania vs Angola: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Albania
- Angola
How they compare
Angola currently reports 86.96 1000 USD against 84.93 1000 USD in Albania, a difference of 2.03 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 107th and Angola ranks 104th of 194 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Angola | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.85 1000 USD | 417.08 1000 USD | 365.22 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2010s | 160.76 1000 USD | 362.05 1000 USD | 201.29 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2020s | 41.84 1000 USD | 397.92 1000 USD | 356.08 1000 USD | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Albania or Angola?
- Angola, at 86.96 1000 USD against 84.93 1000 USD in Albania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Albania and Angola?
- 2.03 1000 USD, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Angola?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Angola rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Albania ranks 107th and Angola ranks 104th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf