Angola vs Croatia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Angola
- Croatia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 86.96 1000 USD against 85.3 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 1.66 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Croatia ahead.
Angola ranks 104th and Croatia ranks 105th of 194 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 195.81 1000 USD | 21.14 1000 USD | 174.67 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2010s | 841.04 1000 USD | 115.14 1000 USD | 725.9 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2020s | 287.3 1000 USD | 128.96 1000 USD | 158.34 1000 USD | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Angola or Croatia?
- Angola, at 86.96 1000 USD against 85.3 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Angola and Croatia?
- 1.66 1000 USD, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Croatia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Croatia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Angola ranks 104th and Croatia ranks 105th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf