Armenia vs Fiji: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Armenia
- Fiji
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 19.21 1000 USD against 17.68 1000 USD in Fiji, a difference of 1.53 1000 USD.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Fiji ahead.
Armenia ranks 140th and Fiji ranks 142nd of 194 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.58 1000 USD | 818.35 1000 USD | 816.77 1000 USD | Fiji |
| 2010s | 2.92 1000 USD | 2,226 1000 USD | 2,223 1000 USD | Fiji |
| 2020s | 26.2 1000 USD | 2,007 1000 USD | 1,981 1000 USD | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Armenia or Fiji?
- Armenia, at 19.21 1000 USD against 17.68 1000 USD in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Armenia and Fiji?
- 1.53 1000 USD, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Fiji?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Fiji rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Armenia ranks 140th and Fiji ranks 142nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf