Armenia vs Liberia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Armenia
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 22.46 1000 USD against 19.21 1000 USD in Armenia, a difference of 3.25 1000 USD.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Liberia ahead.
Armenia ranks 140th and Liberia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.15 1000 USD | 30.62 1000 USD | 27.47 1000 USD | Liberia |
| 2020s | 28.53 1000 USD | 11.19 1000 USD | 17.34 1000 USD | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Armenia or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 22.46 1000 USD against 19.21 1000 USD in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Armenia and Liberia?
- 3.25 1000 USD, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Liberia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Liberia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Armenia ranks 140th and Liberia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf