Aruba vs Cabo Verde: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Aruba
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 0.34 1000 USD against 0.16 1000 USD in Aruba, a difference of 0.18 1000 USD.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 2.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 183rd and Cabo Verde ranks 180th of 194 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.98 1000 USD | 16.54 1000 USD | 11.56 1000 USD | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 0.4933 1000 USD | 4.71 1000 USD | 4.22 1000 USD | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Aruba or Cabo Verde?
- Cabo Verde, at 0.34 1000 USD against 0.16 1000 USD in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Aruba and Cabo Verde?
- 0.18 1000 USD, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Cabo Verde?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Cabo Verde rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Aruba ranks 183rd and Cabo Verde ranks 180th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf