Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Denmark: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
6,406 1000 USD
in 2024
Denmark
5,800 1000 USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
26th
Denmark rank
29th

Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Denmark
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200220132024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 6,406 1000 USD against 5,800 1000 USD in Denmark, a difference of 606 1000 USD.

That makes Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 26th and Denmark ranks 29th of 181 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 12,677 1000 USD 4,926 1000 USD 7,752 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 8,577 1000 USD 3,795 1000 USD 4,782 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 8,943 1000 USD 11,800 1000 USD 2,858 1000 USD Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Denmark?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), at 6,406 1000 USD against 5,800 1000 USD in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Denmark?
606 1000 USD, with Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Denmark?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Denmark rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 26th and Denmark ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Denmark: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-potassic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-potassic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/denmark/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Denmark: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 4,260 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf