Belarus vs Serbia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 37.75 1000 USD against 36.52 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 1.23 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Belarus ranks 129th and Serbia ranks 127th of 194 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.12 1000 USD | 51.52 1000 USD | 42.4 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2010s | 11.5 1000 USD | 35.33 1000 USD | 23.83 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2020s | 25.62 1000 USD | 37.19 1000 USD | 11.57 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Belarus or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 37.75 1000 USD against 36.52 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Belarus and Serbia?
- 1.23 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Belarus ranks 129th and Serbia ranks 127th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf