Belize vs Uganda: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Belize
- Uganda
How they compare
Belize currently reports 284.06 1000 USD against 271.69 1000 USD in Uganda, a difference of 12.37 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 79th and Uganda ranks 81st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,068 1000 USD | 643.13 1000 USD | 425.19 1000 USD | Belize |
| 2010s | 1,088 1000 USD | 999.94 1000 USD | 88.44 1000 USD | Belize |
| 2020s | 349.89 1000 USD | 1,166 1000 USD | 816.47 1000 USD | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Belize or Uganda?
- Belize, at 284.06 1000 USD against 271.69 1000 USD in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Belize and Uganda?
- 12.37 1000 USD, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Uganda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Uganda rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Belize ranks 79th and Uganda ranks 81st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf