Benin vs Kazakhstan: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Benin
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Benin currently reports 13,918 1000 USD against 12,954 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 964 1000 USD.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Benin ranks 12th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 194 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 134.11 1000 USD | 6,740 1000 USD | 6,606 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 4,652 1000 USD | 9,945 1000 USD | 5,293 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Benin or Kazakhstan?
- Benin, at 13,918 1000 USD against 12,954 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Benin and Kazakhstan?
- 964 1000 USD, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Benin and Kazakhstan rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Benin ranks 12th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf