Bermuda vs Kiribati: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Bermuda
- Kiribati
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 7.87 1000 USD against 6.68 1000 USD in Kiribati, a difference of 1.19 1000 USD.
That makes Bermuda's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 155th and Kiribati ranks 156th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.13 1000 USD | 0.62 1000 USD | 2.51 1000 USD | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 0.58 1000 USD | 6.68 1000 USD | 6.1 1000 USD | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Bermuda or Kiribati?
- Bermuda, at 7.87 1000 USD against 6.68 1000 USD in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Bermuda and Kiribati?
- 1.19 1000 USD, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Kiribati?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Bermuda and Kiribati rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Bermuda ranks 155th and Kiribati ranks 156th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf