Bermuda vs Mongolia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Bermuda
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 8.99 1000 USD against 7.87 1000 USD in Bermuda, a difference of 1.12 1000 USD.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Bermuda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Mongolia ahead.
Bermuda ranks 155th and Mongolia ranks 154th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.93 1000 USD | 0.3633 1000 USD | 0.5667 1000 USD | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 3.18 1000 USD | 5.8 1000 USD | 2.62 1000 USD | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Bermuda or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 8.99 1000 USD against 7.87 1000 USD in Bermuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Bermuda and Mongolia?
- 1.12 1000 USD, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Mongolia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Bermuda ranks 155th and Mongolia ranks 154th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf