Chad vs Saint Lucia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Chad
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 1.15 1000 USD against 0.25 1000 USD in Chad, a difference of 0.9 1000 USD.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 4.6 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 169th and Saint Lucia ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 234.24 1000 USD | 1.35 1000 USD | 232.89 1000 USD | Chad |
| 2010s | 4.08 1000 USD | 1.49 1000 USD | 2.58 1000 USD | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Chad or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 1.15 1000 USD against 0.25 1000 USD in Chad as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Chad and Saint Lucia?
- 0.9 1000 USD, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Chad and Saint Lucia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Chad ranks 169th and Saint Lucia ranks 166th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf