Colombia vs Japan: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Colombia
- Japan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 19,760 1000 USD against 19,080 1000 USD in Japan, a difference of 680 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Japan ahead.
Colombia ranks 8th and Japan ranks 9th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,392 1000 USD | 16,315 1000 USD | 5,924 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 17,452 1000 USD | 12,696 1000 USD | 4,756 1000 USD | Colombia |
| 2020s | 18,793 1000 USD | 31,659 1000 USD | 12,866 1000 USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Colombia or Japan?
- Colombia, at 19,760 1000 USD against 19,080 1000 USD in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Colombia and Japan?
- 680 1000 USD, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Japan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Japan rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Colombia ranks 8th and Japan ranks 9th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf