Croatia vs Palestine: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 89.37 1000 USD against 85.3 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 4.07 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 101st and Palestine ranks 98th of 181 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 143.87 1000 USD | 44.33 1000 USD | 99.54 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 130.1 1000 USD | 42.72 1000 USD | 87.38 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Croatia or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 89.37 1000 USD against 85.3 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Croatia and Palestine?
- 4.07 1000 USD, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Palestine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Croatia and Palestine rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Croatia ranks 101st and Palestine ranks 98th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf