Cyprus vs Rwanda: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Cyprus
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 16.12 1000 USD against 15.93 1000 USD in Rwanda, a difference of 0.19 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 143rd and Rwanda ranks 144th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.03 1000 USD | 15.79 1000 USD | 4.24 1000 USD | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 23.76 1000 USD | 1,446 1000 USD | 1,423 1000 USD | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 13.9 1000 USD | 32.02 1000 USD | 18.12 1000 USD | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Cyprus or Rwanda?
- Cyprus, at 16.12 1000 USD against 15.93 1000 USD in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Cyprus and Rwanda?
- 0.19 1000 USD, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Rwanda?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Cyprus and Rwanda rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Cyprus ranks 143rd and Rwanda ranks 144th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf