Estonia vs Latvia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Estonia
- Latvia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 55.15 1000 USD against 54.63 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 0.52 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 116th and Latvia ranks 117th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.19 1000 USD | 34.47 1000 USD | 68.72 1000 USD | Estonia |
| 2010s | 19.57 1000 USD | 187.3 1000 USD | 167.72 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 383.06 1000 USD | 187.51 1000 USD | 195.55 1000 USD | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Estonia or Latvia?
- Estonia, at 55.15 1000 USD against 54.63 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Estonia and Latvia?
- 0.52 1000 USD, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Latvia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Estonia ranks 116th and Latvia ranks 117th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf