Gabon vs Saint Lucia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Gabon
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 1.25 1000 USD against 1.15 1000 USD in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Gabon ranks 175th and Saint Lucia ranks 177th of 194 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.61 1000 USD | 11.11 1000 USD | 57.51 1000 USD | Gabon |
| 2010s | 1.04 1000 USD | 0.9067 1000 USD | 0.13 1000 USD | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Gabon or Saint Lucia?
- Gabon, at 1.25 1000 USD against 1.15 1000 USD in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Gabon and Saint Lucia?
- 0.1 1000 USD, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Gabon and Saint Lucia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Gabon ranks 175th and Saint Lucia ranks 177th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf