Georgia vs Latvia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 54.63 1000 USD against 49.72 1000 USD in Georgia, a difference of 4.91 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 119th and Latvia ranks 117th of 194 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.56 1000 USD | 18.49 1000 USD | 15.93 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 22.39 1000 USD | 223.77 1000 USD | 201.38 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 71.73 1000 USD | 187.51 1000 USD | 115.78 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Georgia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 54.63 1000 USD against 49.72 1000 USD in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Georgia and Latvia?
- 4.91 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Georgia ranks 119th and Latvia ranks 117th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf